Google hikes Australia's ad rates by 5% overnight; we need a tech tax now
Google on Tuesday announced that Australian advertisers serving Google Ads to Austria, France, India, Italy, Spain, Turkey or the United Kingdom will pay up to 5 per cent more for their clicks and ad impressions. The price surge is a result of the digital services tax (DST) imposed by those countries on online advertising in a bid to force big tech firms to pay their fair share of tax. It’s you, it’s me, and more importantly it’s the SMEs that are most reliant on these tech providers for survival that are bearing the cost.
The state of play
There's has been ongoing debate for years that large digital multinationals like Google and Facebook are not paying enough tax, both locally and globally. The commentary is that the existing international tax systems do not properly capture the ‘digitalisation of the global economy’.
To address these concerns the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - now led by former Australian Federal Finance Minister Matthias Corman - has been working with over 130 countries to update the international tax system, to cover the changing global economy. It seems that if approved, the scheme will be implemented in 2023.
Why the hike?
For some countries this change isn’t happening quickly enough and a number of them, including some from Europe, have already started to impose their own Digital Services Tax (DST) as an interim measure. These countries include the likes of Belgium, France, Italy, Poland, Spain and The United Kingdom.
Game on I say. For anyone, this makes total sense and I back both the OECD and these forward-thinking European countries in their decisionmaking and actions.
However the execution is far from ideal and in-fact belittles the whole concept. France was one of the first countries to implement a DST. Amazon immediately responded by saying: “As we operate in the very competitive and low-margin retailing sector, and invest massively in creating new tools and services for our clients and vendor partners, we cannot withstand an additional tax.”
Amazon has basically passed the cost of this tax onto the businesses that utilise their services, which are often SME’s. Therefore this tax is not doing what it is designed to do.
Yesterday, Australian Google Ads customers received this e-mail from Google, notifying us that the cost of advertising has increased in these markets where there is a DST on online advertising.
In some cases, like the UK, the increase is the same as the DST being applied. In others such as Spain, the increase is less that the DST being applied. (DST in Spain is 3%, Google’s increase is 2%).
So in essence, Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon (GAFA) are not paying the DST. Instead it’s you, it’s me, and more importantly it’s the SME’s that are most reliant on these tech providers for survival that are bearing the cost.
NIMBY – Will Australia follow suit?
Yes, it’s inevitable that this will occur.
In 2019 Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, stated that Australia was actively exploring a multilateral response with other OECD countries but resisted the temptation to follow Austria, France, Hungary, Poland and Turkey’s lead and introduce interim measures. “Many stakeholders raised significant concerns about the potential impact of an Australian interim measure across a wide range of Australian businesses and consumers, including discouraging innovation and competition, adversely affecting start-ups and low-margin businesses, and the potential for double taxation,” he said at the time. In the Treasurer's own words, “the Government firmly believes that digital firms, like all firms, must pay their fair share of tax”. But in the country’s that have implemented the tax, they’re not – they’re placing additional financial pressure on advertisers and publishers that have already been hit hard by the pandemic.
I reckon Josh is a smart man, but you could also argue that 3% of the then $1.1 billion in Australian revenue from Google wasn’t attractive enough and the implementation costs outweighed the gains. Perhaps that has changed now that Google’s revenue has ballooned to $5.2 billion (2020).
What needs to happen
As is often the way, the strategy is correct but the implementation poor.
You can only hope that if Australia moves forward with an interim solution it is better thought out the ones implemented by our European cousins. You can only assume that if the OECD bring this to fruition it will look at the mistakes these forward thinking countries have made. The OECD needs to ensure that any update to the international tax system achieves what it sets out to do; tax the large global multinationals, not the small businesses the global economy so heavily relies on.
CFOs are questioning ROI on booming loyalty programs: Here’s how to flip your loyalty program from a Capex drain to a money-making machine
CFOs are starting to question the outlay versus return of loyalty programs. Good loyalty schemes do attract, retain and grow customers although they are costing more to manage as customer expectations continue to rise. There are progressive options to flip loyalty costs into profit – charging a fee is one option but monetising media from partners could prove a smarter, more sustainable approach. Sonder’s Jonathan Hopkins explains why and how.
How first-party data and loyalty can double sales from ad campaigns – provided brands choose the right network
2021 has proven scale and precision from data-driven ad delivery is not enough. To produce truly game-changing results and build stronger direct-to-consumer relationships, marketers need publishers that offer a value exchange with their audiences. Picking the right partner can deliver double the returns for brands that choose a smarter approach in 2022.