Skip to main content
News Analysis 6 May 2020 - 3 min read

'Murky programmatic delta': 88% of ads can't be tracked says new PwC, ISBA investigation

By Paul McIntyre - Executive Editor
GDPR

Can the ACCC crack Google's code in a new legal case on user tracking disclosure, as the Federal government prepares a mid-December response to the Digital Platforms Inquiry?

A world-first, end-to-end programmatic advertising investigation piles more pressure on the stubbornly opaque digital advertising supply chain as Australian industry prepares submissions to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's adtech inquiry.

You need to know this:

  • Unilever, Tesco, Vodafone, GSK, Lloyds Bank, BT, HSBC and British Airways were among blue chip advertisers, media agencies and adtech operatives contributing data in a new study released overnight in the UK from PwC and the peak British advertiser body, ISBA, that has piled heat back on the complex and confusing programmatic advertising sector.
  • In one astounding finding in the new report from PwC and the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers (ISBA) called the Programmatic Supply Chain Transparency Study, 88% of advertising impressions could not be fully traced through a spaghetti map of programmatic suppliers and operatives 
  • 51% of advertiser programmatic budgets reached publishers, known as ‘working media’
  • 15% of advertiser spend is lost in an “unknown delta” that could not be attributed, representing a third of supply chain costs
  • Media agency groups including Carat, Mediacom, Mindshare, Wavemaker, OMD, PHD and Zenith Media participated in the study
  • Adtech firms including Amobee, The Trade Desk, Google’s DV360, Pubmatic, Open X and Rubicon also involved
  • Publishers involved included Bauer Media Group, News UK, Telegraph, The Guardian and Autotrader  
  • ISBA is calling for the immediate creation of a cross-industry taskforce to uncover the causes of the “unknown delta” and urgent standardisation across contractual and technological areas for more data sharing and transparency 
  • Study authors from PwC and ISBA will feature on an Australian Association of National Advertisers webinar on Monday May 11 at 4pm     

 

It took far longer, hit more roadblocks, complexities and black holes than the UK’s peak advertiser body ISBA and even PwC’s forensic might envisaged. But the world’s first end-to-end investigation of the programmatic advertising supply chain has delivered another blow to the “murky” digital ad market that brought a global warning three years ago by P&G’s Chief Brand Officer Marc Pritchard. 

The overnight release of the report came with a warning from BT’s Head of Media, Graeme Adams: “We desperately need to see a common set of ad standards adopted and more openness in this market so that every penny spent is accounted for. If this happens, we’ll invest more in the channel; if not, we will cut back and reshape our trading approaches.” 

Among the recommendations for advertisers, ISBA and PwC says access to buy-side data from agencies and demand-side platforms (DSPs) was not always available and that advertisers should insist their agency has a “separate seat” for each client and that “log level data be readily available. Advertisers could also consider operational changes such as direct contractual relationships with DSPs and strengthening or developing direct publisher relationships”.

On the “unknown delta” the study says it could be due to a combination of practices:

  • Demand and Supply Side Platform fees that aren’t visible 
  • Post-auction bid shading
  • Post-auction financing arrangements or other trading deals
  • Inventory reselling between tech vendors

 

Australian Association of National Advertisers CEO John Broome has been in ongoing briefings with ISBA and PwC on the study’s developments and says time is up. “It’s time for denial of this to be over,” he says. “It’s absolutely clear that there is a component of the supply chain that is still very opaque. It’s no longer acceptable to have this unknown delta of 15%.

When asked if he thought there was deliberate obfuscation, Broome says: “It’s hard to say. I think it’s a bit of both, to be honest. The adtech community shouldn’t be concerned if they stand by the comments they are making around supporting a transparent and visible supply chain.”

Broome says the findings will apply to the Australian market and that it has implications for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s adtech inquiry.

The AANA webinar with the report’s authors on Monday will allow for a Q&A session, Broome said.   

Share your reaction (and see how others voted)

Leave a comment (you must be logged in)

Be the first to comment

Paul McIntyre

Executive Editor

Search Mi3 Articles

Make it personal

Join Mi3 to receive our weekly edition and personalise your experience